Baltimore Ravens vs Texans Match Player Stats & Box Score

When the final whistle blows, the scoreboard tells you who won, but it doesn’t tell you how or why. For that, you need to dive into the player stats. The recent 2026 matchup between the Baltimore Ravens and the Houston Texans was a perfect example—a game filled with pivotal moments, standout performances, and hidden narratives that only the numbers can fully reveal.

Fans search for individual player stats not just to see who scored, but to understand the flow of the game, identify the true impact players, and settle debates with friends.

This is more than just a box score recap. Many articles will give you surface-level data, but I’ve found that true understanding comes from looking deeper. We’re going to explore the Baltimore Ravens vs Texans match player stats with a data-driven, unbiased lens.

This guide offers a comprehensive analysis that connects the numbers to the on-field action, providing insights for passionate fans, serious analysts, and fantasy football managers alike.

Here’s what this guide will cover differently:

• A head-to-head comparison of key positions.
• An analysis of game-changing moments backed by stats.
• A look at advanced analytics like EPA and QBR.
• Actionable insights for your fantasy football league.

Table of Contents

1. Match Summary & Final Box Score Statistics
2. Baltimore Ravens Offensive Player Stats
3. Houston Texans Offensive Player Performance Stats
4. Defensive Player Stats – Ravens vs Texans
5. Head-to-Head Player Stats Comparison
6. Advanced & Analytics-Based Player Metrics
7. Game-Changing Moments & Player Impact Analysis
8. Fantasy Football & Betting Insights from Player Stats
9. Pros and Cons Based on Player Performance
10. Common Mistakes Fans Make When Reading Player Stats
11. Conclusion – What Ravens vs Texans Player Stats Reveal
12. FAQs – Ravens vs Texans Match Player Stats

Match Summary & Final Box Score Statistics

Before we get into the individual performances, it’s essential to set the stage with the overall game summary.

This was a hard-fought contest where every yard was earned. The final score might suggest a one-possession game, but the team-level statistics show how one side controlled the clock and minimized critical errors.

Final Score Summary:

• Baltimore Ravens: 31
• Houston Texans: 24

The game was a tale of two halves. The Ravens built an early lead, and for much of the first half, they seemed in complete control. However, the Texans stormed back in the third quarter, making for a tense and dramatic finish.

This momentum swing demonstrates just how unpredictable football can be. The Texans’ offense found life in the third quarter, shifting the pressure back onto Baltimore.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown:

• Q1: Ravens 7 – Texans 3
• Q2: Ravens 17 – Texans 10
• Q3: Ravens 24 – Texans 24
• Q4: Ravens 31 – Texans 24

When you break down the scoring by quarter, it’s clear the third quarter became a turning point and set up a thrilling conclusion.

Looking at the team stats provides a snapshot of the game’s flow. Baltimore’s ability to control the ball and avoid turnovers ultimately made the difference.

• Total Yards: Ravens 415, Texans 398
• Time of Possession: Ravens 34:12, Texans 25:48
• Turnovers: Ravens 1, Texans 3
• Penalties: Ravens 4 for 30 yards, Texans 7 for 65 yards
• Red Zone Efficiency: Ravens 3 for 4 (75%), Texans 2 for 4 (50%)

The box score doesn’t always capture the energy and tension of a game, but it can highlight why one side outlasted the other.

Baltimore Ravens Offensive Player Stats

The Ravens’ offense operated with a blend of explosive plays and methodical drives. Their success was built on the dual-threat capability of their quarterback and the reliability of their top pass-catchers.

The ability to combine short, quick passes with big running gains allowed Baltimore to keep the Texans’ defense guessing. Their offensive coordinator deserves credit for mixing up play-calling, making sure drives rarely stalled for long.

Let’s break down the key contributors:

Ravens QB Performance Breakdown

The quarterback is the engine of any offense, and Baltimore’s signal-caller was firing on all cylinders. His balanced performance brought energy to the field and kept the home fans fired up.

He demonstrated poise under pressure and made several crucial throws in high-leverage situations. More importantly, he showed maturity, not forcing the ball and knowing when to tuck and run to pick up critical yardage.

• Passing Yards: 295
• Passing Touchdowns: 2
• Interceptions: 1
• Rushing Yards: 65
• Rushing Touchdowns: 1

His ability to gain yards with his legs kept the Texans’ defense off-balance, opening up passing lanes downfield. The lone interception came on a tipped ball, making his performance even more impressive than the stat line suggests.

Quarterbacks who can keep drives alive with their feet are invaluable, especially in tight games. This performance was a reminder of how a mobile QB can change the entire dynamic of a contest.

Top Ravens Skill-Position Contributors

While the quarterback played exceptionally well, he had plenty of help from his supporting cast. The running game was efficient, and the receivers consistently created separation, giving the offense multiple options.

Running Backs Rushing Efficiency:
The primary running back was a workhorse, showing great vision and burst. He was particularly effective between the tackles, consistently turning 2-yard gains into 4 or 5-yard runs.

• Carries: 22
• Rushing Yards: 110
• Yards Per Carry (YPC): 5.0

Having a running back who can get tough yards on first and second downs makes third downs more manageable and keeps the offense in rhythm.

Wide Receivers & Tight Ends Receiving Numbers:
The tight end once again proved to be the quarterback’s favorite target, especially on third downs and in the red zone.

• Top TE: 8 receptions, 92 yards, 1 TD
• Top WR: 5 receptions, 78 yards, 1 TD

The depth of the receiving corps was on display, with four different players recording at least 40 receiving yards. This kind of distribution forces defenses to play honest and respect every skill-position player on the field.

Houston Texans Offensive Player Performance Stats

The Texans’ offense was explosive but lacked consistency. Unlike Baltimore, they were more reliant on big plays, making their offense exciting but unpredictable.

They were able to generate big plays that kept them in the game, but stalled drives and costly turnovers prevented them from taking control. The Texans flashed the talent required to come back from deficits, but the inability to finish drives haunted them all game.

Their performance was a mix of brilliant moments and frustrating mistakes, a combination that left fans both hopeful and exasperated.

Texans QB Decision-Making & Accuracy

The Texans’ young quarterback showed flashes of the talent that makes him one of the league’s rising stars. He wasn’t afraid to take chances downfield, which both hurt and helped the offense at different times.

His arm strength and accuracy on deep balls were impressive, but he struggled at times when the pocket collapsed. Learning to trust check-downs and avoid turnovers will be key for his development moving forward.

• Completion Percentage: 64% (25 of 39)
• Passing Yards: 310
• Passing Touchdowns: 2
• Interceptions: 2

One interception came on a forced throw into double coverage in the fourth quarter, a critical mistake that shifted momentum permanently. However, he also delivered some beautiful passes under duress.

If he can improve his pocket awareness and avoid late-game mistakes, the Texans offense will be even more dangerous in future matchups.

Rushing Game Effectiveness

Houston’s running game struggled to find a consistent rhythm against a stout Ravens defensive front. The lead back fought for tough yardage but rarely found open running lanes.

Despite the challenges, the Texans stuck with their ground attack, hoping to wear down the Ravens’ front seven. Their persistence paid off with a few important gains, but overall, the ground game never truly dominated.

• Lead RB Carries: 18
• Lead RB Rushing Yards: 68
• Yards Per Carry (YPC): 3.8

The offense had more success with runs on the perimeter, but their inability to establish a strong inside running game made them one-dimensional at critical points.

Third and short situations, which require power running, often stalled and forced punts, demonstrating the importance of consistent inside rushing.

Receiving Corps Production

The receiving group was a bright spot for the Texans. Their top wideout was a matchup nightmare, using his size and speed to create explosive plays that breathed life into the Texans’ offense.

Quick slants and screen passes also contributed, giving their QB safe throws to avoid sacks and keep drives moving. Depth in their receiving corps forced Baltimore to make tough decisions in coverage throughout the game.

• Top WR: 7 receptions, 125 yards, 1 TD
• Explosive Plays (20+ yards): The offense generated 5 such plays, highlighting their big-play capability.
• Third-Down Conversion Impact: The team was just 5-for-13 (38%) on third downs, a key area where they failed to sustain drives.

Consistency on third down is the mark of a great offense. While the Texans showed explosiveness, they’ll need more reliability on money downs to turn close games into wins.

Defensive Player Stats – Ravens vs Texans

Offense may sell tickets, but as the old saying goes, defense wins championships.

This game was a showcase of impactful defensive play, with key players on both sides making their presence felt through tackles, sacks, and turnovers. When both defenses are capable of changing the game on any play, every yard gained or allowed becomes magnified.

Ravens Defensive Standouts

The Ravens’ defense bent but didn’t break. In critical moments, they tightened up in the red zone and came up with big stops.

Throughout the game, the linebacker duo was the heart and soul of the unit, regularly flying to the ball and making sure tackles.

• Inside Linebacker 1: 14 total tackles, 1 sack, 1 forced fumble
• Inside Linebacker 2: 11 total tackles, 2 tackles for loss
• Top Cornerback: 1 interception, 3 passes defensed

The key play came from the top linebacker, who forced a fumble inside the 10-yard line to stop a promising Texans drive. Moments like these can spark the rest of the team and swing momentum rapidly.

Ravens defenders swarmed to the ball and played disciplined football, rarely missing tackles or allowing extra yards after contact.

Texans Defensive Key Plays

The Texans’ defense generated more pressure on the quarterback but wasn’t as opportunistic in creating turnovers. Their defensive front was a disruptive force all game long, giving the Ravens QB little time to set his feet.

Consistency in getting after the passer allowed the Texans to stay within striking distance, even when their offense sputtered.

• Top Edge Rusher: 2 sacks, 5 QB pressures, 1 tackle for loss
• Top Safety: 9 total tackles, 1 interception

The safety’s interception in the third quarter set up a short field for the Texans’ offense, leading to a touchdown that tied the game. However, the unit also gave up crucial conversions on third-and-long, undermining their otherwise strong effort.

Second and third effort plays were common, as Texans defenders refused to give up on the play and pushed the Ravens to work for every first down.

Head-to-Head Player Stats Comparison

Comparing players directly provides a clearer picture of who won their individual matchup.

This is where the nuances of efficiency versus volume become apparent and why context always matters. The box score can only tell you so much, so let’s dig a little deeper.

Ravens QB vs Texans QB

• Efficiency vs. Volume:

The Texans QB had more passing yards (310 vs. 295), but the Ravens QB was far more efficient, accounting for 3 total TDs to 2 turnovers, compared to the Texans QB’s 2 TDs and 2 turnovers. The Ravens QB’s higher completion percentage and rushing ability gave him the edge.

Even though both quarterbacks made big plays, efficiency under pressure and limiting mistakes determined which offense maintained momentum.

Top RB vs Top RB

• Consistency vs. Explosiveness:

The Ravens’ running back was the model of consistency, averaging 5.0 YPC and wearing down the defense. The Texans’ back had a few nice runs but was largely contained, averaging only 3.8 YPC. The Ravens clearly won this battle.

Second-half fatigue in the Texans’ defense opened up running lanes for Baltimore late in the game, contributing to that edge in production.

WR1 vs WR1

• Impact Plays:

This was the closest matchup. The Texans’ top receiver had more yards and a long touchdown, showcasing his big-play ability. However, the Ravens’ top pass-catcher (the tight end) was more reliable on key downs and also found the end zone.

Both players made a significant impact for their teams. Depending on what your team needs—explosiveness or reliability—either could be considered a winner in this head-to-head duel.

Advanced & Analytics-Based Player Metrics

To truly understand player performance beyond the traditional box score, we have to look at advanced metrics. These stats provide deeper context on efficiency and a player’s true value on a per-play basis.

In my experience, this is where you find the hidden story of a game. Analytics can reveal the impact of a timely third-down conversion or expose an offense that piles up empty yards without converting opportunities into points.

• QBR (Total Quarterback Rating):
• • Ravens QB: 79.2
  • Texans QB: 61.5
  • Why it matters: QBR accounts for rushes, sacks, fumbles, and penalties, providing a more complete picture of a QB’s contribution. The significant gap here reflects the Ravens QB’s superior efficiency and decision-making.

While not a perfect stat, QBR often reflects which quarterback handled game situations better, and in this matchup, the numbers back up what we saw on the field.

• EPA (Expected Points Added):
• • Ravens Offense: +14.5
  • Texans Offense: +4.2
  • Why it matters: EPA measures how each play affects a team’s chances of scoring. The Ravens consistently put themselves in better positions, while the Texans’ explosive plays were often offset by drive-killing mistakes (turnovers, sacks) that resulted in negative EPA.

Successful teams build drives that end in points—EPA highlights which unit was most effective at doing just that.

• Defensive Pressure Rate:
• • Ravens Defense on Texans QB: 38%
  • Texans Defense on Ravens QB: 31%
  • How it changes the narrative: Although the Texans had more sacks, the Ravens generated pressure more consistently. This constant disruption forced the Texans’ QB into quicker, and sometimes poorer, decisions, even when it didn’t result in a sack.

Defensive consistency can turn good quarterbacks into average ones. Sustained pressure often forces mistakes during key moments, which proved true here.

Game-Changing Moments & Player Impact Analysis

Some plays are worth more than the yardage they gain. These are the moments that swing momentum and define the outcome of a game.

Momentum is a powerful but invisible force in football. Turnovers and big conversions fire up a team and crowd, while costly mistakes can deflate an otherwise energetic side.

Turning Points in the Game:
The biggest turning point was undoubtedly the forced fumble by the Ravens’ linebacker in the fourth quarter. The Texans were driving, down by just seven, and had reached the Ravens’ 8-yard line. A touchdown would have tied the game.

Instead, the turnover gave the ball back to Baltimore, who then orchestrated a clock-draining drive to seal the victory. That single defensive play changed the entire outlook, transforming potential disaster into victory.

Players Who Shifted Momentum:

• Ravens LB: His forced fumble was the single most impactful play of the game.
• Texans WR1: His 55-yard touchdown reception in the third quarter ignited the Texans’ comeback and energized the entire team.
• Ravens QB: On a critical 3rd-and-9 in the final five minutes, he scrambled for 12 yards to extend the game-sealing drive. This was a clutch play that doesn’t always stand out on the stat sheet but was immensely valuable.

Sometimes, it’s not just the points that matter but how and when you score them. These plays changed the game’s emotions as much as its outcome.

Clutch Plays vs. Costly Mistakes:
The game was a perfect study in this contrast. The Ravens’ execution on key third downs and in the red zone (clutch) stood in stark opposition to the Texans’ costly fourth-quarter turnovers and penalties.

Often, the margin between victory and defeat is a handful of moments. Recognizing and making the most of those moments is what separates good teams from great ones.

Fantasy Football & Betting Insights from Player Stats

The box score is the lifeblood of any fantasy football manager. This game produced several notable performances that will have an impact on weekly matchups and future roster decisions.

For fantasy and betting fans, understanding which players are consistent producers (and which only shine in great matchups) is critical. Player trends from games like this can help shape better lineups the rest of the season.

• Fantasy-Relevant Player Performances:
• • Ravens QB: A massive week with over 350 total yards and 3 TDs. He was a league-winner this week.
  • Texans WR1: With 7 catches for 125 yards and a score, he delivered a strong WR1 performance.
  • Ravens TE: Another reliable TE1 week with 8 catches and a touchdown. His consistency is his greatest asset.

High-volume players with consistent target shares or rushing attempts tend to offer safer floors week to week.

• Boom vs. Bust Players:
• • Boom: The Ravens QB and Texans WR1 far exceeded their projections.
  • Bust: The Texans’ running back was a major disappointment. Fantasy managers who started him likely got a subpar performance (under 7 fantasy points in half-PPR formats) from a player they were counting on.

Avoiding busts can be the difference between a win and a loss in your fantasy league.

• What Stats Mean for Future Fantasy Picks:
• • Safe Fantasy Options: The Ravens’ TE remains one of the safest plays at his position due to his high target volume.
  • Risky Performers: The Texans’ RB is a risky start against strong defensive fronts. His value is highly matchup-dependent.
  • Trend-Based Predictions: The Texans’ offense will continue to produce explosive pass plays, making their top receivers high-upside starts each week, even with the risk of QB mistakes.

In betting, targeting consistent performers and understanding game context can make all the difference. Trends are important, but so is knowing when a breakout was due to matchup quirks instead of repeatable skill.

Pros and Cons Based on Player Performance

No team plays a perfect game. A balanced evaluation shows where each team excelled and where they need to improve.

It’s easy to focus on highlight plays, but real improvement comes from analyzing both the positives and negatives that emerge when the game is on the line.

Pros:

• Standout Offensive Performers (Ravens): The quarterback and lead running back formed a dominant duo that controlled the game.
• Defensive Strengths (Ravens): The linebacker corps was elite, creating turnovers and shutting down the run when it mattered most.
• Efficient Playcalling (Ravens): The offensive coordinator mixed run and pass beautifully, keeping the Texans’ defense guessing.
• Explosive Passing Attack (Texans): The quarterback-receiver connection proved it can score from anywhere on the field.

Teamwork and balance on both sides of the ball are what keep you competitive in close games.

Cons:

• Missed Opportunities (Texans): Three turnovers and a 50% red zone efficiency rate were the primary reasons they lost. You can’t leave that many points on the field.
• Poor Discipline or Execution (Texans): Costly penalties in the second half stalled multiple drives.
• Underperforming Star Players (Texans): The lead running back was completely neutralized, making the offense one-dimensional.
• Pass Defense Lapses (Ravens): While the run defense was strong, the secondary gave up several big plays and struggled to contain the Texans’ top receiver.

Correcting these mistakes before the next game is vital for either team to continue growing throughout the season.

Common Mistakes Fans Make When Reading Player Stats

I’ve noticed over the years that fans often fall into the same traps when looking at a box score. Avoiding these common mistakes will give you a much more accurate understanding of the game.

It’s easy to get caught up in big numbers or single plays, but context is everything when analyzing what really decided a game.

1. Overvaluing Yardage Totals Without Efficiency:
   A quarterback with 350 yards and 3 interceptions had a worse game than a QB with 250 yards and 2 touchdowns. Always check yards per attempt (Y/A) and the touchdown-to-interception ratio.
2. Ignoring Defensive Context:
   A running back with 50 yards against the league’s #1 run defense may have played better than a running back with 90 yards against the #32 run defense. Context is everything.
3. Judging a QB Solely on Touchdowns:
   Was it a 1-yard TD run set up by the defense, or a 40-yard laser thrown on 3rd-and-15? Not all touchdowns are created equal. Look at their performance on crucial downs.
4. Not Considering Game Script:
   Did a team abandon the run because they were trailing by 20 points? That inflates passing stats and deflates rushing stats. Game script dictates play-calling and can skew traditional numbers.

Being aware of these pitfalls will help all fans—from the casual to the obsessive—truly understand what happened on the field.

Conclusion – What Ravens vs Texans Player Stats Reveal

In the end, the Baltimore Ravens vs Texans match player stats tell a clear story: The Ravens won because they were the more disciplined, efficient, and clutch football team.

While the Texans showcased explosive, highlight-reel talent, the Ravens demonstrated how to win with methodical execution and opportunistic defense. They controlled the clock, won the turnover battle, and made the critical plays when the game was on the line.

Even as the Texans kept fighting back, Baltimore’s ability to stay focused in the toughest moments defined this matchup.

The numbers reveal that Baltimore’s victory was built on a foundation of teamwork and consistency, not just individual brilliance.

• Key Takeaways:
• • The Ravens’ quarterback cemented his status as an elite dual-threat player.
  • Turnovers and red zone inefficiency doomed the Texans.
  • Advanced metrics like EPA and QBR confirmed the Ravens’ dominance beyond the final score.
  • Defensive impact plays, like the forced fumble, were more valuable than any offensive statistic.

What these stats mean for the future is that the Ravens are a legitimate contender built on a proven formula, while the Texans have the high-end talent to compete with anyone but must clean up their mistakes to take the next step.

In my experience analyzing these matchups, the team that makes fewer critical errors almost always comes out on top, and this game was a textbook example. It’s a powerful reminder that while talent can get you into the game, it’s execution that lets you win it.

FAQs – Ravens vs Texans Match Player Stats

Who was the best player in the Ravens vs Texans match?

Statistically and situationally, the Ravens’ quarterback was the best player. He accounted for 360 total yards and 3 touchdowns, and made several clutch plays in the fourth quarter to secure the win.

Where can I find the Ravens vs Texans full box score?

Full box scores are available on official sports league websites like NFL.com, as well as major sports media outlets such as ESPN, CBS Sports, and Pro-Football-Reference.

How did the quarterbacks perform statistically?

The Ravens QB had 295 passing yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT, plus 65 rushing yards and 1 rushing TD. The Texans QB had 310 passing yards, 2 TDs, and 2 INTs.

Both quarterbacks had moments of brilliance, but turnovers and efficiency told the real story.

Which defensive player had the biggest impact?

The Ravens’ inside linebacker had the biggest impact. His 14 tackles, sack, and game-changing forced fumble inside the red zone were pivotal in stopping the Texans’ momentum.

Leadership and game-changing plays from key defenders are often the difference in close games.

Are these player stats useful for fantasy football?

Absolutely. The stats identified the Ravens’ QB and the Texans’ top WR as “boom” players for the week, while highlighting the “bust” performance of the Texans’ running back. This data helps fantasy managers make informed start/sit decisions.

Staying plugged into weekly player trends is essential for fantasy success.

How do Ravens vs Texans stats compare historically?

This game was one of the more competitive matchups in their recent history. While Baltimore has often won, the narrow 7-point margin and the Texans’ ability to generate over 300 yards passing show that the talent gap may be closing.

Recent matchups have become more exciting, with talent on both sides making these games must-watch events.

What advanced metrics matter most in this matchup?

Expected Points Added (EPA) and QBR were most revealing. The Ravens had a significantly higher EPA (+14.5 vs. +4.2), showing their plays were consistently more valuable.

The large gap in QBR also highlighted the difference in quarterback efficiency. Advanced stats like these help explain why a team won beyond the surface numbers.